Booklet ܣܝܦܐ “The Centenary of the Syriac Genocide Sayfo”
Booklet issued by Syriac Orthodox Patriarchate, Damascus
The Ottomans [1] and the Syriac Genocide ܣܝܦܐ
Following the battle of Marj Dabeq[2] and the occupation of the Levant[3] (or what is also known as Greater Syria) by the Ottomans in the year 1516, the Syriacs were ruled by the Ottomans who made them subject to ALJIZYAH (which might be referred to as ‘poll tax’), being Christians living in a Muslim land.[4] In addition, they prohibited the Syriacs from riding horses except in the case of the patriarchs. Further, the Syriacs were not spared the tyranny and injustice suffered from the Ottomans by the other residents in the Levant, especially from an economic point of view as poverty and deprivation were the hallmarks of that era.
In their social dealings with the Christians, the Ottomans adopted a divide and conquer principle between Christians and Muslims which resulted in favoring the Muslims with more rights and privileges when compared to those of the Christians. In fact, the divide principle was also applied in their dealings within the different denominations of Islam which was a very evident practice by the invaders who sought to apply this principle of ‘divide and conquer’.
The situation became worse towards the end of the Ottoman reign during the Hamedi era (1879-1908) when the Ottoman state came up with the ‘conspiracy theory’, accusing the Christians of having allegiance to outside European powers, with whom, as the Ottomans thought, the Christians shared a common faith, in an attempt to destroy the Ottoman state. As a result, they unleashed their wrath against Christians (e.g. Armenians and Syriacs) and carried out the terrible massacres against them. Here, one would reflect upon and contemplate these events and ask rather a deeper question: Did the European countries forge these fabrications to deceive the Ottomans into believing such conspiracy existed? Or did the Ottomans themselves fabricate these allegations?
We hope that the latter hypothesis would be the most accurate record of events as it would be hurtful to know if our first hypothesis is correct. We are also invited to question deeper the intent of the European countries as to whether they collaborated with some of their Christian residents to present forged documents to the Ottomans. These unanswered questions remain under review and surely require further investigations.
We must keep in mind that the terrible carnage was not only the result of Ottomans perpetrators on their own, but that unfortunately the Ottomans used different tools to implement their crimes. As a result, the Kurds appeared on the stage as an instrument of murder inflecting atrocities on behalf of the Ottomans. As it is known, the Kurdish nationalists believed and strived to establish their statehood to enjoy freedom of belief, and thus they were prepared for the struggle to achieve their goals. But the Ottomans maliciously understood this thirst by the Kurds for the independence.
It is worthwhile to note here that the Kurds were one of the diverse nationalities in the Ottoman Empire like the Balkan residents, Macedonians and Greeks that gained independence from the Ottoman Empire after they rebelled and received great support from the French and English navies who destroyed the Ottoman and the Egyptian fleets at the Battle of Navarino in Greece in 1827.
Because the Kurds lived in southeast Anatolia alongside the Syriacs and their state claimed a large part of Southeast Anatolia and as the Ottomans had inner hatred for the Christians to the extent of extermination and deportation from the center of Anatolia, and as the Ottomans were preoccupied with religious discrimination, they issued decrees and sent orders for attacks upon the Syriacs in the region.
Unfortunately, the Kurds were so blinded by their desire for independence that they remained blind regardless of witnessing young children, women and the elderly falling victims to their inhumane acts. They stood side by side with the Ottomans in the genocide of our people, their deportation, exile and expulsion from their homeland. It should be noted that the Ottomans looked upon both the Syriacs and Kurds with contempt. However, at the time, they considered the Kurds as one of their allies simply because they shared the same Islamic religion, while in their eyes they believed that the Christians were conspiring with the Europeans against the Ottoman Empire. All this resulted in one of the most heinous, dreadful and wicked crimes of genocide against our people, known in Syriac as the “Sayfo” massacre of 1895 to 1915.
Nor, in this regard, can we overlook the nationalization policy pursued by the Union and Progress Association following the coup that ended the reign of Sultan Abdul Hamid II in 1908, and its attempt to melt other nationalities into one under the authority of the Ottoman Empire, establishing a Turkish character in language and identity. This resulted in a redrawing of the area’s demographics, accompanied by the fear the Syriac Christians would sympathize with their fellow Christians in the First World War (1914 – 1918), especially since the Ottoman Empire had allied itself with Germany against France, Britain and Russia.
With the wide influence of the French and the English in the territory of the Ottoman state through consulates, schools and Christian missions, as we stated earlier, the Ottomans feared that local Christians could conspire with their European coreligionists against the Empire. This brought the “Sayfo ܣܝܦܐ” massacres as a pre-emptive strike to exterminate them and deport them further south of Anatolia.
In preparation for these massacres, the Ottoman authorities issued early orders in 1915 to remove weapons from all Christians in Mesopotamia, denying them the right to defend themselves, under the pretext of the obligation of each denomination to provide a quantity of arms to the Ottoman Empire. This was followed by forced entry into the villages and cities inhabited by the Syriac people, annihilating, torturing and displacing the residents of those villages.
We cannot justify or accept any excuse for these criminal acts against our people in the northeast region of Syria, southeast parts of Asia Minor and Mesopotamia. We also cannot formulate reasons for this heinous crime. However, and in order to provide honest historical record of what took place we looked at different aspects to understand the historical context that led to the “Sayfo” massacres.
Previously, we indicated that the Christians in this region were the pioneers of creative and innovative human thinking and civilization. They played a prominent and essential role in what is known as the “Arab awakening” which produced prominent figures that contributed to the awakening of patriotic feelings among the peoples of this region and encouraged independence from the Ottomans.
The international missionaries became very active in the area as the Ottoman state had failed to educate our local people, and these missionaries played a major role in dividing the Christians in the East which ultimately resulted in the weakening of the Christian Church in the Levant.
By the same token, the European nations also suffered immensely from the Ottomans as they approached Vienna in Austria. The Ottomans were stretched thin and started to show symptoms of weakness in the year 1750. However, their defeat only came to fruition during the First World War (1914-1918). Throughout that period, the Ottomans looked at the Christians of Europe as their main enemy and extended their abhorrence to the Christians of the East who were accused of conspiring to destroy the Ottoman Empire.
The SAYFO ܣܝܦܐ Massacres (1895-1915-1924)
The Land of Mesopotamia (the land between the two rivers Tigris and Euphrates) witnessed the first massacres against our people commencing in 1895. The outset of the massacres took place on January 1, 1895[5] in Edessa which resulted in the martyrdom of 13,000 of our people. This was followed by the massacre of (Wayran Shahar) Tal Mozalt on November 3, 1895 when the Kurds and the Ottomans attacked our people, ransacking their homes and beheading more than 3,000 people.[6] Moreover, on the 20th of November of the same year, the Kurds attacked the village of Dierka, near Mardin, prior to the massacres of Tel Arman and Marrah Castle, near the Za’afaran Monastery, which saw 75 men killed.
In addition, other massacres took place. For example, the massacre of Amid (Diyarbakir), which took place on October 20, 1895, and was considered one of the worst massacres at that time. This massacre took place when the Kurds attacked the area in accordance with an Ottoman decree that was issued by Sultan Abdul Hamied II who ordered the extermination of the Armenians and Syriacs. This massacre lasted months and spilled over to include several other villages in Diyarbakir area such as Sadia, Mayafrien, Qarabash, Qutarbal.[7] During these raids and massacres, the attackers ransacked churches and stole crosses and church vessels, saying to the Christians: “Where is your God?”[8]
Regarding these massacres, Fr. Aphram Mirza Shekro wrote a poem describing these awful events[9], and below we quote an extract of what he said:
“I Cry and Cry more, lamenting the brothers and sisters. I extend the sympathies and sorrows to the clergy of the altar. They separated the children from their mothers who were crying out loud in the public squares. They threw the children in the rivers and shot the young men, Kidnapped the women and the brides and threw them in the public squares, Killed the men with no mercy and made the children taste the atrocities.”
Furthermore, the massacres of 1895 also extended to include the areas of Siedas, Sasson and Harput[10]. To help account for the massacres that were inflected on the Syriacs in 1895 please refer to (Table 1) below.
Table 1: A schedule outlining the dates of the massacres and the names of the cities that were subject to these massacres. | |
City Name | Date of massacre |
Edessa | 1/1/1895 |
Wayran Shahar -Tal Mozalt | 3/11/1895 |
Al Mansouriea | 5/11/1895 |
Deariek (Al Qousour) | 20/11/1895 |
Banabli | 9/11/1895 |
Nisibis | 10/11/1895 |
Midyat | 20/11/1895 |
Mardin | 3/11/1895 |
Diyarbakir | 1/11/1895 |
Al Saadiea | 1/11/1895 |
Myafraqan | 1/11/1895 |
Qarabash | 11/1895 |
Qutarbal | 11/1895 |
The massacres of the Ottomans against the Syriacs in 1915
As highlighted earlier, and as Turkey joined the First World War as an ally of the Germans, a military order was issued on April 1, 1915, confiscating all weapons and demanding owners to surrender their weapons at the government house. The order included all Ottoman areas in Anatolia. The process to collect or surrender the weapons commenced, which brought out the main intention of this Ottoman order, which can be merely described as the brutal killing of our people with the sole intent of exterminating them.
It was only 20 years after the 1895 massacres had taken place, and our people had, once again, become the subject of new atrocities and a new genocide. This new genocide covered different areas such as Edessa, Diyarbakir and Mardin where our people suffered immensely and paid the ultimate price.[11] Below we provide two tables which provide an idea of these atrocities, outlining the dates of the massacres and the names of the cities in which these massacres took place (Tables 2 and 3).
DIYARBAKIR
Table 2: A schedule outlining the date of the massacres and the names of the cities in the province of Diyarbakir. | |
Village Name | Date of massacre |
Qatarbel | 1/4/1895 |
Kabiea | 10/4/1895 |
Qarabash | 20/4/1895 |
Garouqiea | 2/6/1895 |
Saadia Brafa | June 1895 |
MARDIN
Table 3: A schedule outlining the date of the massacres and the names of the cities in province of Mardin. | |
Village Name | Date of massacre |
Bnabiel | 9/6/1915 |
Dara | June 1915 |
Massarta | 2/6/1915 |
Bavaow | 4/6/1915 |
Bakiera | June 1915 |
Al Mansouriea | 21/6/1915 |
Al Qousour | 14/6/1915 |
Qalt | 3/6/1915 |
Al Sour | June 1915 |
Mor Aho – Arzon | June 1915 |
Azekh – Beth Zabieday | April 1915 |
Siert | 15/6/1915 |
Karboran | June 1915 |
Qalat Marah | 11/6/1915 |
Nisibis | 4/6/1915 |
Below we provide a copy of a rare historical document by the Thrice Blessed Patriarch Aphrem I when he was the Archbishop of Syria, representing His Holiness Patriarch Elias III at the Peace Conference that was held near Paris in 1919.[12] This table (Table 4) offers an idea of the number of people who were persecuted or converted to Islam in that time[13]:
Table 4: Table presented by Severius A. Barsoum [Thirce Blessed Mor Aphrem I] to the Peace Conference held in Paris in 1919, which provides a brief idea of the atrocities against our people
[People of Mesopotamia] during the period 1915-1918 (de Courtois, 2004, p. 239)
Conclusion
The above provides only a brief idea of the immense atrocities against our people. The genocide SAYFO ܣܝܦܐ that was unleashed on our people left a profound impact due to its brutality and severity. For those who remained alive, they had no other choice but to flee their homelands, seeking shelter in a safer place, leaving behind their forefathers’ land, monasteries and churches, disappearing from the area and unfortunately wiping out their presence. The genocide “SAYFO ܣܝܦܐ” impacted the numbers of our people as we lost more than 500,000 Syriacs during these atrocities, and the impact continues today as our numbers in Syria, Iraq and Turkey are on the decrease with the new wave of SAYFO ܣܝܦܐ.
Indeed, this booklet is just a record of part of what our people sustained and suffered during the genocide against the innocent people of our Church. The memory of “SAYFO ܣܝܦܐ” will remain with us to strengthen our resolve and pride in being a nation with a unique identity and strong connection to the message of Christ as we proudly carry His cross. Christians will remain in the East, promoting peace, forgiveness and the love of Christ no matter what sufferings they face as they experience a renewed “SAYFO ܣܝܦܐ” that brings religious discrimination, persecution, sufferings and displacement to our people, reciting with Saint Paul in his Letter to the Romans 8:35:
“What will separate me from the love of the Messiah: Suffering, or imprisonment, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?”
We will never forget the bloodshed of our forefathers and grandfathers which will remain as the fragrance of Christ, increasing our attachment to our land, so we may stand witnesses, as they did, and continue to be the salt of this earth and the light of the world as followers of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Publication of Syrian Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch and All the East, Damascus – Syria, 2015
Notes
[1] Their origin traces back to a Turkish clan that migrated from the southern parts of the land beyond Mesopotamia (the land between the two rivers) in central Asia under the pressure of the invasion of Genghis Khan. They settled on the banks of Lake Van near the Euphrates in the east of Asia Minor in the year 1224. Further, Othman Ben (i.e. son of) Artughrul Ben (i.e. son of) Suleiman Shah is the true founder of their state. Thus, they were called Ottomans after him. [2] This is an area located east of Aleppo where the battle between the Ottomans (Saleem I) and the Mamluks (Kanso Al-Ghoury) was fought with the Ottomans winning and occupying Syria. [3] The Levant currently includes: Syria, Lebanon, Palestine and Jordan. [4] Laila Sabbagh, (2000) The Contemporary History of the Arabs, Ba’ath University, Homs, p. 195. [5] Asmar Al-Kas Georges, A.D. (1986). Wounds in the History of the Syriacs, Translated by Subhi Youhanan, Beirut, The Syriac Communication Committee, 1st Edition, p. 15. [6] ibid, p. 23. [7] Eyewitness of atrocities – Al-Qusara fi nakabat al-nasara (The Calamities of the Christians). p. 51. [8] Asmar Al-Kas Georges, A.D. (1986). Wounds in the History of the Syriacs, Translated by Subhi Youhanan, Beirut, The Syriac Communication Committee, 1st Edition, p. 42. [9] 15 ibid, p. 56. [10] Eyewitness of atrocities Al-Qusara fi nakabat al-nasara (The Calamities of the Christians), p. 43. [11] The events commenced on February 18, 1915 when an Ottoman decree in the province of Diyarbakir was issued for the execution of twelve young men in the village of Karabash as they failed to report for Ottoman military service. It is worthwhile to note here that these martyrs were Syriacs (nationality and Christian denomination). The decision to enlist these young men into the Ottoman military service was enacted prior to the decision to withdraw weapons from our people. [12] After the end of the First World War, and the victory of the allies (France, Britain and the United States) over Germany and Turkey, all parties were invited to a Peace Conference that was held at the Versailles Palace near Paris. [13] This table was included in a submission to the World Council of Churches on SAYFO ܣܝܦܐ by B. Issa and T. Issa of Australia in October of 2014, pp. 9 and 10.